Game Theory and Baseball
Ever since 1977, there have been links between mathematics
and baseball. The chief reason for this is because of a man named Bill James,
who coined the term “sabermetrics”, which is the application of statistical
analysis to baseball records used to compare and evaluate players’ and teams’
success. This boiled down to Bill James having the ability to find value in
cheap players that were written off by the MLB, and change the way
organizations scout and draft players (he is now a chief advisor for the Red
Sox). I’m sure most of you have seen or heard of the movie, Moneyball (excellent flick and pretty
much Jonah Hill’s audition for serious movies later on). Since the moneyball revolution in the early
2000s, all teams have been looking for more ways to get a leg up on the
competition, and it seems that game theory is next in line. In the last five
years, game theory has been applied to baseball to try to improve future
performance in a number of ways, such as the following: Pitch Selection,
Batting Discipline, and Player Drafting.
Nash Equilibrium and Drafting
The first application of game theory that we will run
through will utilize our good friend John Nash, and how the Nash equilibrium
can apply to drafting prospects out of high school and college. In 2012, the
MLB instituted a new rule regarding bonuses for drafted players. This rule
essentially created slots for groups of players based on their pick number that
determined the maximum bonus they could receive, for example let’s say all
players between picks 15 and 25 are allowed a max of $1,000,000. Each team has
a total amount that they can spend on draftees, so if a team goes big in the
early rounds, then they will have to be more frugal on later in the draft. The
experts broke this down to find a Nash equilibrium. So lets say two teams, the
LA Dodgers and San Francisco Giants are debating on picks early in the draft
between picking a proven college player, and a top high school prospect. Each
team must decide in advance if they need to negotiate a contract with a high
school player, so they don’t know what the other team will do. The figure below
shows us how the teams will act:
Dodgers\Giants
|
College draftee
|
High-school
draftee
|
College draftee
|
5,5
|
1,7
|
High-school draftee
|
7,1
|
3,3
|
As we can see with our trained Nash eyes, both teams will
end up choosing high school draftees although they could guarantee a higher
payoff elsewhere. The reason behind this numbers is that high school players
are a bigger risk/reward payoff, meaning if both teams picked a college star,
it is cheaper and he will contribute right away rather than spending years in
the minor leagues. However, it is optimal for both teams to pick the high
school player because if the Giants choose a college star, and there is a
future superstar from high school then the Dodgers must choose a high school
player. Both teams will end up drafting high school players because although it
is a riskier option, it is the “smart” move (basically due to the Mike Trout
effect, an MLB MVP at the age of 23).
Pitching
Next we will look at the applications of game theory to
pitch selection and how some pitchers can improve performance. This application
works by taking one player and analyzing each pitch and measuring its
effectiveness against all others thrown by that pitcher. With each pitcher in
the graph below, his first pitch (most thrown) and second pitch were analyzed,
with scores ranging from -3.2 to +5. A positive score means the pitch is more
effective so should be thrown more, and the opposite for a negative pitch. The
number below is a graph of the best and worst pitchers measured:
The closer each pitch number is to 0.0, the closer the
pitcher is to throwing the optimal number of fastballs, sliders, curveballs
etc. As we can see from the graph Tanner Roark is a smart pitcher, and Ross
Detwiler not so much.
Batter Up
Game Theory has also been applied to help batters out in key
situations, such as at the end of games with a 3-2 count (on the next pitch the
batter either walks, gets a hit, or is out). The prisoner’s dilemma box applies
to this situation, but we won’t find a Nash equilibrium in this situation.
Let’s say for the sake of the game that if a pitcher throws a strike and the
batter swings, he will get a hit and the pitcher loses. If the pitcher throws a
ball and the batter swings, then the batter is out and the pitcher wins. If a
batter decides not to swing, he is gambling that the pitcher will throw a ball
and not strike him out. The box below shows us the predicament the players are
in:
Pitcher\Batter
|
Swing
|
Take
|
Strike
|
-1,1
|
1,-1
|
Ball
|
1,-1
|
-1,1
|
Because there is no zone where both players are satisfied
with their decision, a mixed strategy must be played in order to find
equilibrium, which means deciding a move on probability. Long story short, (I
will explain the math in class) we find an equilibrium in the long run if both
the pitcher and batter choose each strategy 50% of the time. Both players will
win half the time, and because the other player is choosing each option 50% at
random, neither can improve utility by altering strategy.
As we can see, there are many applications of math to this
nation’s pastime and this game theory connection is relatively new for baseball
so I’m sure there is more to come in the future! So that is a bit of game
theory and baseball, again if you liked reading this post at all, go watch Moneyball right now, the trailer is linked here. See ya Tuesday
folks.
-HGC
Sources:
At first when I saw this was about baseball, I thought it was only going to be based around pitching and hitting. But the concept of drafting and how that apply is really interesting. That whole concept actually applies to all sports (pre high school drafting rules of course). Im sure owners arent drawing these boards out and giving utility comparing two different prospects, but this is such a cool concept. Great job presenting today!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the post and presentation Harry!
ReplyDeleteI was curious about the first pitch of an at bat. Lots of batters just let it go right down the middle of the plate for a strike, almost a waste of a pitch. So I am curious if there is a decision matrix for taking or swinging. I know pitchers take notes on all the batters that they face, and so they have to take note if the batter lets it go, or swings. I am curious if there is a correlation or something. Here is a website that I found that helped answer some questions.
http://www.duluthmn.gov/media/122793/header-tables-2007-mn-residential-code.pdf
Harry, your blog and discussion made me realize how little I know about baseball. I found the Nash equilibrium of drafting particularly interesting. I'm still unclear why high school baseball players are more desirable than college players. It makes sense that there is a higher risk in drafting younger players, but where does the higher payoff come from? Do we assume the payoff is higher simply because the high school players of interest are just better, and are consequently drafted at an early age?
ReplyDeletegood question, so the higher value for drafting high school players is due to the development they get in the pro system. There is a major gap between professional college level programs in development due to the lack of practice time and restrictions in the NCAA, not to mention if a player is practicing with better (pro) players they will improve more quickly. So the pro leagues accelerate player growth for young players much faster than going to college.
DeleteHello Harry. You gave a great presentation on this subject. I had seen the movie moneyball before (one of my favorites by the way), so I was familiar with the fact that there was a way to pair baseball and mathematics to put together a winning team, but your discussion really took my understanding of baseball math to the next level. It is amazing to see the information that can be revealed about a pitcher using the strategy you showed and I was a little bit disappointed to see that indeed drafting high-school players is the dominant strategy even if it is not the one maximizing payoff. I wonder if strategies change during the playoffs since the amount of games to be played is unknown. Cheers mate
ReplyDelete